Rules for Reviewers

1) The reviewer is obligated to objectively evaluate the submitted article;

2) is obligated to refuse to review if a conflict of interest or lack of competence in the article’s subject matter is suspected;

3) should report any significant similarities between the reviewed text and other works known to them;

4) should indicate significant works related to the subject of the reviewed text not cited by the author;

5) may not use the reviewed work for their own personal needs or benefit;

6) is obligated to submit the review using the form within the specified deadline.

7) The review concludes with a clear statement regarding the rejection of the text, publication of the text without corrections, or the need for the indicated corrections.

8) Reviewed works are confidential and disclosure to unauthorized persons is prohibited.

9) The content of the review is not publicly disclosed.

10) The reviewer does not suggest adding links to their own works to the reviewed article.

11) The author receives the reviews in an anonymous form. Direct interaction between the author and the reviewer is prohibited.

12) The reviewer does not use generative AI tools in the review process (see AI Policy).